Good practices of initiative:
ESP: PRONEGOCIOS: Programa de Fomento de Negocios Rurales - Honduras
Relevance
It measures the alignment of the initiative with existing policy frameworks in the country. In addition, the scalability of the initiative to other realities and geographies is valued.
| Marco | Description | Ambit | Country | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country Vision 2010-2038 | National | Honduras | Link | |
| National Plan 2010-2022 | National | Honduras | Link | |
| Strategy of the Government of Honduras (GoH) in force in the agri-food and rural sector | National | Honduras | Link | |
| National Program for Sustainable Rural and Urban Development (PRONADERS) | National | Honduras | Link |
Eficacy
This measures how well the objectives and goals set out in the initiative were fulfilled, as well as the extent to which the results achieved are attributable to the actions implemented by the initiative.
| Indicator | Description | Indicator Type | Measure Unit | Base date | Base | Goal | Measure Date | Measure | Compliance | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Competitiveness Strategies for Regional/Departmental Development Formulated | Impact | Number | 01-12-2010 | 467,531 | 469,781 | 01-12-2015 | 610,193 | 1.3 | PCU/EG reports | |
| PRONADERS Regional Facilitation Centers for Olancho, Gracias a Dios, Colón and El Paraíso established | Impact | Number | 01-12-2010 | 1,397 | 1,500 | 01-12-2015 | 1598 | 1.07 | PCU/EG reports | |
| PRONADERS institutional strengthening plan implemented | Results | Number | 01-12-2011 | 0 | 168 | 01-12-2015 | 190 | 1.13 | PCU/EG reports | |
| farm size | Results | Hectares | 01-12-2010 | 1,044 | 1,305 | 01-12-2015 | 1,445.7 | 1.1 | Impact evaluation (Socioeconomic indicators for the mean of SAF farmers) | |
| Farm income with respect to total household income | Results | Percentage | 01-12-2010 | 0 | 3,500 | 01-08-2022 | 6,800 | 1.97 | Impact evaluation (Socioeconomic indicators for the mean of SAF farmers) | |
| household income | Results | US$ | 01-12-2010 | 0 | 1 | 01-12-2011 | 1 | 1 | Impact evaluation (Socioeconomic indicators for the mean of SAF farmers) | |
| Producer age | Product | Years | 01-12-2010 | 0 | 72 | 01-12-2015 | 77 | 1.07 | Impact evaluation (Socioeconomic indicators for the mean of SAF farmers) | |
| Producer education | Product | Years | 01-12-2010 | 0 | 1 | 01-12-2011 | 1 | 1 | Impact evaluation (Socioeconomic indicators for the mean of SAF farmers) | |
| Children under 16 years | Product | Number | 01-12-2010 | 0 | 185 | 02-12-2013 | 185 | 1 | Impact evaluation (Socioeconomic indicators for the mean of SAF farmers) | |
| Age of land tenure | Product | Years | 01-12-2010 | 0 | 449 | 01-12-2014 | 449 | 1 | Impact evaluation (Socioeconomic indicators for the mean of SAF farmers) | |
| farm size | Product | Hectares | 01-12-2010 | 0 | 36 | 01-12-2015 | 36 | 1 | Impact evaluation (Socioeconomic indicators for the average number of non-participants in the sample) | |
| Farm income with respect to total household income | Product | Percentage | 01-12-2010 | 0 | 162 | 01-12-2015 | 162 | 1 | Impact evaluation (Socioeconomic indicators for the average number of non-participants in the sample) | |
| household income | Product | US$ | 01-12-2010 | 0 | 4 | 01-12-2015 | 4 | 1 | Impact evaluation (Socioeconomic indicators for the average number of non-participants in the sample) | |
| Producer age | Product | Years | 01-12-2010 | 0 | 4 | 01-12-2011 | 4 | 1 | Impact evaluation (Socioeconomic indicators for the average number of non-participants in the sample) | |
| Producer education | Product | Years | 01-12-2010 | 0 | 1 | 01-08-2022 | 0 | 0 | Impact evaluation (Socioeconomic indicators for the average number of non-participants in the sample) |
Eficiencia
Efficiency is the assessment of whether a public intervention achieves its objectives while using resources in a way that the costs incurred are proportional to the economic, social, or environmental benefits obtained.
| Indicator | Description | Indicator Type | Measure Unit | Base date | Base | Goal | Measure Date | Measure | Compliance | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency | 17,717,352 | |||||||||
| Efficiency | 18,015,252 | |||||||||
| Efficiency | 26,410,324 | |||||||||
| Efficiency | 27,163,629 | |||||||||
| Efficiency | 19.2 | |||||||||
| Efficiency | 19.4 | |||||||||
| Efficiency | 26.8 | |||||||||
| Efficiency | 27.7 | |||||||||
| NA | 1.17 | |||||||||
| Efficiency | 1.18 | |||||||||
| Efficiency | 1.29 | |||||||||
| Efficiency | 1.30 |
Learned lessons
Gained knowledge from implementing, evaluating, and managing a policy intervention, including why it was or was not effective and how it could be improved in the future.
| Lesson | Description | Source |
|---|---|---|