| Marco | Description | Ambit | Country | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Fruit Program of El Salvador (FRUTAL ES) - Work Report 2000-2003 | The program is part of the government's "NEW ALLIANCE" strategy, launched in 1999, which sought to generate local employment and income opportunities, provide more accessible and higher-quality basic services, and strengthen the institutionalization of spaces for participation and the commitment of local stakeholders to their development. | National | El Salvador | Link |
| Indicator | Description | Indicator Type | Measure Unit | Base date | Base | Goal | Measure Date | Measure | Compliance | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planting Coverage of New Fruit Areas | Area planted in blocks of new fruit plantations | Effectiveness | 1 Central American manzana | 01-01-1970 | 0 | 01-01-1970 | 2,503 manzanas sembradas | Link | ||
| Production of Vegetative Material | Plants produced in supported nurseries | Effectiveness | Number of plants | 01-01-1970 | 0 | No especificada explícitamente | 01-01-1970 | 1,925.0 manzanas totales | Link | |
| Benefited Producers | Number of producers served by type of assistance | Effectiveness | Number of producers | 01-01-1970 | 01-01-1970 | 4,566 nuevas manzanas identificadas como potencial frutícola, 195 visitas de asistencia técnica realizadas, y promoción de viveros: establecimiento de viveros en múltiples regiones. | Link |
| Indicator | Description | Indicator Type | Measure Unit | Base date | Base | Goal | Measure Date | Measure | Compliance | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Program Investment | Total budget executed during 2000-2003 | Efficiency | US dollars | US$ 1,775,423.32 (presupuesto total asignado) | 100% de ejecución presupuestaria alcanzada al final del período | Link | ||||
| Efficiency per hectare | Cost per apple of newly established fruit-growing area | Efficiency | USD per Central American manzana | US$ 922.34 por manzana (US$ 1,775,423.32 ÷ 1,925.0 manzanas) Cálculo proporcionado en el documento. | Link | |||||
| Operational Efficiency | Number of technical activities carried out | Efficiency | Activities per year | 225 eventos de capacitación total (56.25 eventos/año promedio), 195 visitas de asistencia técnica, y 89 reuniones de promoción realizadas | Link |
| Indicator | Description | Indicator Type | Measure Unit | Base date | Base | Goal | Measure Date | Measure | Compliance | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Producer organization established and functioning | Percentage of supported nursery growers who joined the national organization | Sustainability | Percentage | 0 organizaciones de viveristas | 1 organización nacional funcionando | 1 organización (AVIVERSAL) establecida con junta directiva | More than 50% of nursery growers enrolled in the Program and 30 of them formed the national organization. | Link |
| Lesson | Description | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Medium-Term Fruit Development Model | The four-year experience (2000-2003) demonstrated that sustainable development in fruit growing requires a comprehensive, medium-term approach. The program successfully consolidated a solid foundation of 1,925 hectares of new fruit plantations, demonstrating that agricultural transformation takes time to yield tangible and sustainable results. | |
| Strategic Diversification Based on Agroecological Aptitude | The final crop distribution (58.4% avocado, 27.1% cashew, 9.5% Persian lime, 5.0% coconut) revealed the importance of adapting the technological offer to the agroecological conditions and preferences of producers, rather than imposing predetermined crops. | Link |
| Evolution of the Approach: From Individual Crops to an Integrated System | The documents show an evolution from the initial focus on specific crops to an integrated system of services that includes: market intelligence, provision of vegetative material, production and technology, financial management, and communication/dissemination. | Link |
| Importance of Institutional Continuity | The four-year period allowed for the development of strong institutional capacities and the establishment of lasting relationships with beneficiaries, demonstrating that rural development programs require long-term horizons to generate sustainable impacts. | Link |
| Effective Technology Transfer Model | The combination of direct technical assistance, massive training (225 events), specialized dissemination materials and financial support proved to be a successful formula for the adoption of new technologies in the rural sector. | Link |
| Documentation as a Sustainability Tool | The extensive production of technical materials, newsletters, fact sheets, and specialized publications created a wealth of knowledge that transcends the duration of the program, facilitating the replicability and continuity of the processes. | Link |