| Marco | Description | Ambit | Country | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDC: Nationally Determined Contribution of Honduras | Commitment to reduce GHG emissions by 15% in the energy, industrial processes, agriculture, and design sectors by 2030. | National | Honduras | Link |
| Indicator | Description | Indicator Type | Measure Unit | Base date | Base | Goal | Measure Date | Measure | Compliance | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reduction of net GHG emissions | Projection to 2030. | Effectiveness | tCO₂e/year | 01-01-2016 | 7.6 MtCO₂e/año emisiones netas | Escenario 1: -50.6 MtCO₂e acumuladas (2016-2030); Escenario 2: -29.3 MtCO₂e acumuladas | 01-12-2030 | En progreso | Link |
| Indicator | Description | Indicator Type | Measure Unit | Base date | Base | Goal | Measure Date | Measure | Compliance | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Present Value (NPV) of investments in silvopastoral practices | Efficiency | USD | 2016-01-01 | En proceso. | VAN positivo para viabilidad económica | Alta intensificación: VAN $259,506 (Escenario 1) vs $153,613 (línea base) Media intensificación: VAN $172,925 (Escenario 1) vs $96,517 (línea base) Baja intensificación: VAN $102,068 (Escenario 1) vs $61,215 (línea base) | Link |
| Indicator | Description | Indicator Type | Measure Unit | Base date | Base | Goal | Measure Date | Measure | Compliance | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of farms that maintain practices after 5 years | Continuity of implemented silvopastoral systems. It is also important to mention that these indicators are part of the initiative's design; there is no evidence of implementation. | Sustainability | Percentage | 2016-01-01 | 0% (línea base pre-proyecto) | 80% de adopción continuada | No hay información. | In progress. | Link |
| Lesson | Description | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Institutional integration. | Coordination between multiple institutions (SAG, DICTA, SERNA, FENAGH) is essential but requires clear frameworks of accountability. | Link |
| Phased financing. | Access to credit is the main barrier. Initial international support (30% of the cost) is required to build trust in local financial institutions. | Link |
| Practical training. | Field Schools are more effective than theoretical training. Practical demonstrations accelerate adoption. | Link |
| Heterogeneity of producers. | Practices must be adapted to farm size. Small producers (67% higher NPV) show a better benefit/cost ratio than large ones. | Link |
| Co-benefits as a motivator. | Immediate economic benefits (increased milk production) are more motivating than long-term environmental benefits. | Link |
| Simplified verification. | MRV systems should be simple for producers with low educational attainment, using easily measurable indicators. | Link |
| Climate adaptation. | Silvopastoral systems demonstrated greater resistance to drought, validating their adaptive value in the face of projected climate change in the region. | Link |